Posts filed under 'Open Source'
Well, I would definitely
fancy that, XForms with SWT yummy. I watch the
Mozilla XForms activity for a couple of years now but they don’t really seem to get to a publicly deployed version of Firebird with one soon. But even if they would I would still love to have support for that in my Java applications because what can be better than a rich GUI without all the hassle needed to actually build it and hard wire it.
Chiba is an almost-complete implementation of XForms for Java. Chiba seems to be easily embeddable on the client side providing so an XForms client for Java applications.
We are thinking and will try to use it to create an Eclipse RCP XForms client. This is directly related with the Z3ECM and CPS projects: we would like to use Eclipse RCP as a rich client capable to consume XForms coming from the server, as would do the web browser.
The first step will be to set up an XForms client that will use HTML Form as interface (played into the SWT browser). Then we will try to use the UIGenerator of Chiba to create on the fly SWT forms directly from XForms. (no, I'm not stone ! 
September 6th, 2005
Well, finally it happen and I hope, will be huge. For those of you not so familiar with Linux, QT is a C++ cross platform (Windows, Linux, Mac OS X) development framework which happens to be the foundation of the KDE window manager. KDE was and still is my choice of Window Manager under Linux for it’s maturity, multitude of well integrated applications.
QT is developed by Trolltech an Norwegian company who was smart enough to get involved with the Linux community and dual license they tool kit both GPL and commercial, which basically means you are free to use their tools as long as your application will be free (GPL), otherwise you can alway buy the licenses. Now, Trolltech got famous, had a rock solid and smart toolkit, the only problem was that they dual licensed only the Linux version of their toolkit and recently the OS -X version, which means, free apps but only under Linux and Mac, no Windows. With version 4 of QT also the Windows version is made available under the same terms as the Linux and Mac versions.
Now the big thing is that the road is free for some great Linux/KDE only applications to be ported under Windows. I would love to see my all time favorite applications available for free to the Windows users. What I miss mostly is KMail & Kontact (the best email client I used), Konqueror (the cool/fast/standard web browser), Quanta (the best free editor for PHP, CSS, HTML coding), Koffice (a good and simple enough office suite), I’m sure I miss many other applications.
What Gnome/GTK could offer for a long time (windows binaries) now KDE can too. Let’s not forget the cool: Gimp (Photoshop like graphic application), Inkscape (vectorial, svg graphical application), Gaim (multi protocol IM client) which are some great native Gnome/GTK apps but which also run under Windows.
June 29th, 2005
“
Last year at OScon, I gave a presentation entitled What Book Sales Tell Us About the State of the Tech Industry. One of the conclusions I drew was that Java was in decline,
as its share of total programming language book sales had dropped by
five percentage points in the twelve months ending June 2004. Well, we
just re-ran those numbers, and saw a startling reversal.” [Tim]
I think the increase has
nothing to do with Open Source and everything to do with the Desktop.
Java was always friendly with the Open Source culture, I think it was
just a lucky moment at the beginnings when the Apache organization got
involved with it, today it’s just natural to consider making
your Java project public and Open Source and Apache and BSD licensing
are just as natural to any Java developer as the language itself,
nothing has changed in this aspect this year, things go on just as they
did in the past years.
The big problem with Java was that it was cornered server side, no
wander with the big troubles Swing had (performance and platform
inconsistencies), but then IBM bought OTI and their SWT project,
started building Eclipse and making it public. Java started to have an
honorable path to Desktop side.
So what happened this year? SWT
and RCP got mature enough to be actually usable (Azureus, a SWT based
Java bit torrent client is the number 1 downloaded application on
SourceForge to prove that). Sun probably realized that they might loose
any chance to keep Swing in the picture so they really started making
it work. Java 1.5 is a huge step (maybe the biggest since 1.1) forward
for Java, huge performance increases and a solid vision about GUI apps.
Right now Java is a serious platform for GUI applications and with two
great toolkits competing against each other with two great user bases
trying to prove that their toolkit and platform (RCP and NetBeans) is
best for development and the end user.
Yes I think 2005 is the year in
which Java got a new start, it’s desktop side, it’s
a fact and it’s unstoppable (the language itself is popular,
tons of libraries covering every aspect, most of them with BSD or
Apache licenses, great enterprise and server side support, still on the
cutting edge of the emerging technologies and for sure right there,
multiplatform when multiplatform really starts to matter).
June 19th, 2005
Nokia announced today that it is using
best-of-breed open source software as the basis of a new mobile browser:
“A key component of this development has
been Nokia's cooperation with Apple, as the Series 60 browser will use the same
open source components, WebCore and JavaScriptCore, that Apple uses in its
popular Safari Internet browser. Based on KHTML and KJS from KDE's
"Konqueror" open source project, this software has enabled Safari to
achieve industry-leading features and performance. Nokia intends to continue
its collaboration with Apple and actively participate in the open source
community to further develop and enhance these components, contributing Nokia's
expertise in mobility.
...
Nokia is excited to enrich Series 60 with
optimized mobile Web browsing. Open source software is an ideal basis for
development since it enables Nokia to leverage and contribute to speedy
software innovation and development. As a result, the entire Series 60 value
chain, from manufacturers and operators to end-users, will benefit from the
flexible architecture, full Web compliance and a truly enjoyable user
experience," said Pertti Korhonen, Chief Technology Officer, Nokia.”
Open Source was here to stay, I think
nobody had any doubts about that, mainly because it’s an movement which can not
be stopped, how do you stop 200.000 people from doing what they think matters,
you can’t. What is new is that corporations are more and more involved in it.
Just think about it, IBM and Eclipse, Sun and Java, Apple Safari and KHTML and
Konqueror, AOL and Mozilla and the enumeration can go on and on.
I think what happens is that Open Source is
now part of some business strategies, the targets are different but the results
are the same. IBM invested in Eclipse and was a wise move, for them Eclipse is
the foundation for a new set of products, more eyes see more problems, but more
important having the same foundation the switch from Eclipse to their tools is
natural and effortless.
Not to mention that for an independent
developer or a small company Eclipse might be enough, but for a medium or big
company it is not, they need exactly what IBM has to offer. But for IBM the
story doesn’t end here, they try to position themselves where the money is and
will be in the next period, they will be the platform, not they but RCP (the
foundation of Eclipse and IBM’s Workplace). Having RCP out there and
Open Source, IBM will have the plugins, applications, functionality and plenty
of developers with deep know how of the platform, a port from RCP to Workplace is just as natural and effortless.
Apple was also smart when they choose KTHML
over Mozilla. KHTML was written from scratch in a clean, nice, object oriented
way, it is just natural if you want to adapt something to chose the most
maintainable thing, and the Mozilla’s core while might have seemed the best
choice was anything but maintainable with it’s inherited bloat. Apple wanted a
browser and a platform they control at the lowest cost available, and they
choose the most suited for their purpose. Different story with AOL, they just
wanted an edge in their negotiations with Microsoft and probably a backup
solution and certainly they’ we got that.
So, good for them but what is in it for us,
the end users. Well I would say plenty; Konqueror is a better browser because
of Safari and now is the second browser that passed the Acid Test 2. Nokia will
have to give back something and even if will not be code, growing the user base
of a standard compliance browser is enough for me. My company switched from
Xemacs to Eclipse and it went in a transparent and natural way and I’m glad we
did because it is a terrific development environment. SWT and RCP is the
foundation for our products for at least 2 years now, and I’m glad we did that
too, our clients are glad since they are no longer locked into an Microsoft
platform, they can switch to almost anything else that matters when they choose
and if they choose.
There is money in Open Source, important is
to know where to look, we would definitely have to focus not on code sold but
on value sold.
For us the end users, great moments are ahead, I can barely wait for
Trolltech to
release QT4 as Open Source for Windows too, just way to see a lot of great applications already available for KDE being available for Windows too.
June 13th, 2005
After the first public release of SpaceMapper DataStore and MN8 last week I have some data to draw some conclusions. Unfortunately, on the release date, the FreshMeat announcement contained links which did not passed through the SourceForge counters
(the link was directly to prdownloads instead of the downloads section
on the status page), so I have no Idea about the downloads in the first
day. However seems that there is a lot more interest in an XML database
than in a new scripting language and even so 78% are interested in the
binaries and only 22% in the source of the database project. With the
scripting language the situation is reversed, 79% interest in the
source and only 21% in the binaries. I guess peoples are more
interested in how to write an interpreter than in using a new one 
No feedback, no bugs, no mailing list interest no contributors which is reasonable to a first public release.
What is not reasonable is that the Klez virus on somebody's computer
noticed the release and it sends thousands of virused mails with my
email address in the from. In case anyone receives one I'm really
sorry, it's not my fault, it's not from me and you can verify that by
looking at the source of the message. All the mails I send goes through
our server (194.102.233.6) which I'm sure you won't find in the
received headers.
November 11th, 2002
The final report of the FLOSS survey and study sponsored by the IST program is now on-line at: http://floss1.infonomics.nl/finalreport/
This report contains new statistical information about usage,
creation and economics of free / open source software, as well as
policy surveys and recommendations, mostly related to Europe.
It's quite a lengthy report, packed with some quite interesting
results, worth having a look at it. For instance the use of Open Source
Software by country: Germany 43.7%, UK 31.5%, Sweden 17.7 %. The Open
Source activities of the 25 major software companies: 32% major OS
development activities (IBM, HP, Compaq, SAP, CA, Hitachi, Sun, ...),
12% small OS projects (EDS, BMC, Adobe, ...) and 52% no visible OS
projects (Microsoft, Oracle, ...)
July 19th, 2002
I was looking at the nice KDE desktop and saying "Ok, now what do
I do?" I don't have Office (don't tell me to use Star Office or
whatever they're calling it this week). [Sam Gentile's Radio Weblog]
I've got my Office with the laptop, nothing to do there, but even when I'm in Windows I'm more happy with Open Office.
I have hree reasons for that. First, I'm the 20% type of user (as
probably many of you) and Open Office fully satisfies my needs.
The second reason. It uses nice XML as document type. If you save a Star Office or Open Office document and then open it with some unzip utility (WinZip?) then you will find a couple of beautifully architect-ed XML
documents. Data, metadata and styles are completely separated. Why it
is this so important to me ? Because in some near future I may make a
quick and dirty script to import all my Open Office / Star Office
documents in an XML storage system and do whatever I want with them,
including publishing them on the net with my own skins or generate PDF
documents or whatever.
Now, I'm sure that you can do that with Word to but you will have to get dirty for that.
The last reason is the Drawing application, you can save your drawings as SVG and again, because SVG is XML you can do quite some interesting things with it.
